Recommendation 5: Evaluation
Recommendation Manager
David Holdzkom, Assistant Superintendent for Evaluation and Research
(00:01:09)
The Auditors Recommended:
“Formalize comprehensive assessment procedures to provide data for decision making at all levels of the system. Establish a formalized process for selection, implementation, and evaluation of programs utilizing data that will be used as feedback for revision or continuation of programs and practices.” (p. 361)
What This Means To The Community:
Recommendation 5 suggests improving the use of data in decision making. A district-wide evaluation process that looks at student assessment and program evaluation in a comprehensive manner would provide the quantity and quality of information that district staff needs to make rational decisions about the design of the curriculum, how its delivered and its effectiveness. Such a process would also communicate to the public the methods of measurement and accountability used by district leadership.
Individual Action Steps
- G.5.3 Adopt a policy for a framework for policy evaluation - cost-benefit analysis. (Administration)
- A.5.1 Assist the Board in the development of the policies. Submit draft policies to the Board. (p. 362)
- A.5.2 Write administrative regulations. (p. 362)
- G.5.1 Policy to provide a framework for systematic assessment and program evaluation (Administration)
- A.5.3 Establish E&R as a clearinghouse for all assessments and evaluations. (p. 362)
- G.5.6 Policy that requires a schedule for reporting evaluation of effectiveness of the curriculum and program evaluation reports. (Administration)
- A.5.4 Assign responsibility for developing and implementing student and program assessment to the E&R department. (p. 362)
- G.5.2 Direct the Supt to develop comprehensive assessment and program planning. (Administration)
- G.5.7 Commit adequate resources to support student and assessment plan. (Policy)
- A.5.5 Conduct an evaluation of all existing programs.(p. 363)
- G.5.3 Adopt a policy for a framework for policy evaluation - cost-benefit analysis. (Administration)
- G.5.5 Support the Supt to provide data dissemination and analysis assistance. (Administration)
- G.5.4 Support the Supt. To train all instructional staff in the use of data. (Administration)
- A.5.6 Establish and require a short-term and long-term training program for administrators and teachers on data. (p. 363)
- A.5.7 Expect all program evaluations to have a cost/benefit analysis and recommendations for continuation or elimination. (p. 363)
- A.5.8 Establish clear expectations for administrators and teachers. (p. 363)
- A.5.9 Monitor the implementation of board policies and regulations. (p. 363)
Legend
- Light gray text indicates completed items.
- Item numbers that begin with "A" are action steps assigned to staff by the CMA.
- Item numbers that begin with "G" are action steps assigned to the Board of Education by the CMA, that the Board has reassigned to staff.
- Items bounded by a thin box are being treated by staff as a single action step.
CMA Basics
Executive Summary (1.1 MB Adobe Reader File - Updated Sept. 18, 2007)
Complete Curriculum Management Audit Report (2 MB Adobe Reader File)
Video & Audio
Dr. Burns Reports : WCPSS PodCast
What's Happening with the Curriculum Management Audit? (video)
Podcast: Curriculum Management Audit
The School Connection: The Curriculum Management Audit: A View from the Classroom
The School Connection: Curriculum Management Audit
Wake EduCast Extra #1: Curriculum Management Audit Overview
News Stories
Teams Report on Curriculum Audit Progress
Superintendent Burns Calls for Elimination of Achievement Gaps
A Hard Look for a Better School System
Curriculum Management Audit Expected to Recommend Changes
Phi Delta Kappa Auditors Complete Site Visit at WCPSS
Superintendent Presents First School System Midterm Report Card
Curriculum Matters Reports
July 2008 (PDF File)
April 2008 (PDF File)
All Curriculum Matters Reports require the free Adobe Reader to view or print
